Broader perspective on HTA value, obesity treatments, and France’s HTA approach ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­    ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏  ͏ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ­  
View in browser
Office of Health Economics | OHE

The Bulletin

Your biweekly update on health economics, policy, and impact

This week, we highlight adopting broader perspectives on value in HTA, exploring how obesity medicines are seen differently, and the core HTA values guiding decisions in France.

  • The case for adopting a broader perspective on value in Health Technology Assessment

  • Why do we expect obesity medicines to work differently?
  • Around The World in HTAs: France – Three Core HTA Values

In a rush? That's your Bulletin summary done, or find the full story below.

Chris Skedgel | Director

Chris Skedgel, Director

Two perspectives on perspective

 

In coincidental but serendipitous timing, OHE released a report last week arguing for adopting a broader perspective on value in HTA, just preceding the release this week of the Health Economics Methods Advisory (HEMA) report on defining the appropriate benefits for economic evaluation of health care technologies.

The OHE report argues that a broader perspective is necessary to understand the full impact of a disease and its treatment. Such an understanding would facilitate HTA decision-making that can recognise the full value of health gains and ensure health gains or cost savings don’t come at the expense of informal carers, family members or broader society.

The HEMA report largely agrees with the principle of considering broader impacts. However, as explained in a letter of dissent to the final report from Lotte Steuten, OHE’s Deputy Chief Executive and a member of the HEMA working group, the report’s recommendations arguably put more weight on the risks and uncertainties around broader value elements than on similar risks and uncertainties around the status quo.  This imbalanced, biased approach is a barrier to recognising the full impacts of diseases and their treatments.

 

Are HTA decisions missing the real burden of disease?

The case for adopting a broader perspective on value in Health Technology Assessment

 

Many health technology assessment (HTA) decisions focus on a narrow payer perspective. This can overlook indirect costs and wider impacts on carers, families, and society. This whitepaper outlines why broader perspectives should be used more routinely, particularly when diseases create substantial indirect costs and spillover effects.

 

Why broader perspectives matter in HTA decisions

Weight gain after GLP-1s shouldn't be surprising

Why do we expect obesity medicines to work differently?

 

GLP-1 medicines support weight management while patients are on treatment, but benefits do not persist after discontinuation. Public and policy narratives often treat this as a failure, unlike with antihypertensives or statins. Reframing obesity as a chronic, relapsing condition can guide better clinical practice, shape HTA, and inform policy decisions, including reimbursement, access, and long-term care strategies.

Obesity management is long term

France’s roadmap for innovative health technologies

Around The World in HTAs: France – Three Core HTA Values

 

France’s HTA system, led by Haute Autorité de Santé, evaluates medicines and medical devices for clinical benefit, innovation, and economic impact. Pharmaceuticals are assessed through clinical benefits (SMR) and clinical added value (ASMR) criteria, prioritising randomised controlled trials, with economic evaluations informing price negotiations for innovative products. 

France’s HTA framework in detail

Freelance PR & Media Relations Specialists

 

We're recruiting freelance PR & Media Relations Specialists in the US, MENA and APAC. If you’re passionate about shaping health policy conversations and amplifying evidence-based research across global markets, this is an exciting opportunity to work with the world’s oldest independent health economics research organisation. 
Interviews will commence on the week of March 16.

 

Learn more about the opportunity

If you’ve made it to the end and enjoyed this edition, hit reply and share one insight that stood out to you.

Office of Health Economics | OHE

Office of Health Economics, 2nd Floor Goldings House, Hay's Galleria, 2 Hay's Lane, Southwark, London SE1 2HB, United Kingdom, +44 (0) 20 7747 8850

Unsubscribe Manage preferences

LinkedIn
BlueSky
X
Website